Filesystem MCP vs Firecrawl MCP
Filesystem MCP is currently the stronger option based on benchmark score, installability, and documentation quality. Filesystem MCP scores 37/100 and Firecrawl MCP scores 25/100.
Comparison
| Attribute | Filesystem MCP | Firecrawl MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Files & Storage | Web Scraping & Crawling |
| GitHub stars | 90,179 | 7,423 |
| Forks | 11,600 | 880 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Last commit | Sep 3, 2026 | Sep 8, 2026 |
| Supported clients | Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, Cline, Windsurf, Zed | Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Cline |
| Best for | Read and write local files | Crawl and scrape websites |
| Risk level | High | High |
| Popularity score | 95 | 72 |
| Freshness score | 100 | 100 |
| Maintenance score | 100 | 100 |
| GEO score | 73 | 65 |
| Benchmark score | 37 | 25 |
| Install status | unknown | unknown |
| Startup status | unknown | unknown |
| Capability discovery | passed | skipped missing env |
| Capabilities | 9 tools / 1 resources / 0 prompts | 0 tools / 0 resources / 0 prompts |
| Docs score | 0 | 0 |
| Config score | 0 | 0 |
| Safety score | 0 | 0 |
| Last tested | Sep 7, 2026 | Unknown |
When to choose Filesystem MCP
- You want broader GitHub adoption — Filesystem MCP has 90.2K stars vs 7.4K.
- Your main use case is Read and write local files.
When to choose Firecrawl MCP
- You want the more recently maintained option (last commit Sep 8, 2026).
- Your main use case is Crawl and scrape websites.
Alternatives to Filesystem MCP and Firecrawl MCP
- Google Drive MCP★ 90.2K · Files & Storage
search and read files stored in Google Drive
- gk-cli★ 455 · Files & Storage
the GitKraken MCP Server for managing repos, PRs, issues across GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and more
- mcpcap★ 51 · Files & Storage
analyzing PCAP files
- mason★ 7 · Files & Storage
context engineering MCP server — generates CLAUDE.md files via structured codebase analysis
- ChangeThisFile★ 5 · Files & Storage
convert files between 690+ formats: image, video, audio, documents, ebooks, archives. Free, no auth
- flight505-mcp_dincoder★ 2 · Files & Storage
driven Intent Negotiation — Contract-Oriented Deterministic Executable Runtime DinCoder brings the…
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Filesystem MCP and Firecrawl MCP?
Filesystem MCP is an MCP server that helps AI assistants read, write, and search files in allowed local directories. Firecrawl MCP is an MCP server that helps AI assistants crawl websites and convert pages into clean markdown or structured data. Filesystem MCP is best for Read and write local files, while Firecrawl MCP is best for Crawl and scrape websites.
Is Filesystem MCP or Firecrawl MCP more popular on GitHub?
Filesystem MCP is more popular, with about 90.2K GitHub stars versus 7.4K.
Which is more actively maintained, Filesystem MCP or Firecrawl MCP?
Filesystem MCP's most recent commit was Sep 3, 2026, and Firecrawl MCP's was Sep 8, 2026. More recent activity is a signal of active maintenance.
Are Filesystem MCP and Firecrawl MCP open source?
Filesystem MCP is open-source under the MIT license. Firecrawl MCP is open-source under the MIT license.
Last updated